Влияние удаления премоляров на жевание
Apr. 27th, 2026 09:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
healthy_back https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8357216/
Angle Orthod. 2017 May 9;87(5):703–708. doi: 10.2319/112116-836.1 Changes in occlusal function after extraction of premolars: 2-year follow-up. Wookang Yoon a, Soonshin Hwang b, Chooryung Chung c, Kyung-Ho Kim d, PMCID: PMC8357216 PMID: 28485615
The occlusal contact area and force showed a tendency to decrease immediately after treatment and then gradually increase to pretreatment levels during the observation period. However, the occlusal contact area did not recover fully after 2 years in the four premolar extraction group.
Нижняя челюсть сместилась после удаления премоляров
https://www.chosunobr.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.21851/obr.43.03.201909.196
Oral Biol Res 2019; 43(3): 196-201 https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.43.03.201909.196
Chewing performance in orthodontic patients treated with extraction of premolars
Insan Jang* , Eunhye Jang , Dong-Soon Choi , Bong-Kuen Cha
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea
The comparison of kinesiographic parameters between groups at T1 are presented in Table 1. No significant difference was found in most of the kinematic parameters between extraction and non-extraction groups before treatment. As shown in Table 2, on the other hands, opening and closing velocities significantly decreased, and turning point of chewing cycle displaced more superior at T2 in extraction group. Cycle time did not significantly differ between T1 and T2 either in extraction group nor in non-extraction group.
Angle Orthod. 2017 May 9;87(5):703–708. doi: 10.2319/112116-836.1 Changes in occlusal function after extraction of premolars: 2-year follow-up. Wookang Yoon a, Soonshin Hwang b, Chooryung Chung c, Kyung-Ho Kim d, PMCID: PMC8357216 PMID: 28485615
The occlusal contact area and force showed a tendency to decrease immediately after treatment and then gradually increase to pretreatment levels during the observation period. However, the occlusal contact area did not recover fully after 2 years in the four premolar extraction group.
Нижняя челюсть сместилась после удаления премоляров
https://www.chosunobr.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.21851/obr.43.03.201909.196
Oral Biol Res 2019; 43(3): 196-201 https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.43.03.201909.196
Chewing performance in orthodontic patients treated with extraction of premolars
Insan Jang* , Eunhye Jang , Dong-Soon Choi , Bong-Kuen Cha
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea
The comparison of kinesiographic parameters between groups at T1 are presented in Table 1. No significant difference was found in most of the kinematic parameters between extraction and non-extraction groups before treatment. As shown in Table 2, on the other hands, opening and closing velocities significantly decreased, and turning point of chewing cycle displaced more superior at T2 in extraction group. Cycle time did not significantly differ between T1 and T2 either in extraction group nor in non-extraction group.